True or False: If pesticide drifts onto a non-target area, causing injury or economic loss, the applicator is legally responsible.

The statement is true. When pesticide drift occurs and results in injury or economic loss to a non-target area, the applicator legally bears the responsibility. This principle is grounded in the concept of liability in pesticide application, where the applicator must ensure that the pesticide is applied in a manner that minimizes risk to non-target areas and organisms. If drift does happen, demonstrating negligence or failing to adhere to label instructions can hold the applicator accountable for damages incurred.

Additionally, laws and regulations governing pesticide use generally mandate that applicators follow best practices to prevent drift, and they can be held liable if they fail to comply with these standards, regardless of whether the incident was intentional or unintentional. Being legally responsible underscores the importance of proper training and understanding of pesticide application techniques, which serve to protect both the environment and public health.